Houstoncriminalattorney



Houstoncriminalattorney

Texas Super Lawyers

Better Business Bureau

State Bar of Texas

Areas of Practice

Contact Us

Homicide in Texas

January 24th, 2012

Texas has six potential charges for homicide:

  • Murder
  • Capital murder
  • Manslaughter
  • Criminally negligent homicide
  • Intoxication manslaughter
  • Capital sabotage

The terms ‘voluntary’ or ‘involuntary’ manslaughter are no longer used in Texas (’sudden crime of passion’ used to be classified as voluntary manslaughter, but is now an affirmative defense to murder). Confusion arises because Texas has the categories capital murder (death penalty or life imprisonment with no parole) which is called a capital felony, murder which is a first-degree felony (or second-degree felony for a sudden crime of passion), manslaughter which is a second-degree felony, and criminally negligent homicide which is a state-jail felony.

Further, we don’t have “second-degree-felony murder” in Texas. We could have “second-degree-felony homicide” which would now be straight manslaughter (or could be ’sudden passion’ murder, as well as intoxication manslaughter.)

TexasPenal Code

19.01. TYPES OF CRIMINAL HOMICIDE.

a) A person commits criminal homicide if he intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence causes the death of an individual.

b) Criminal homicide is murder, capital murder, manslaughter, or criminally negligent homicide.

19.02. MURDER.

a)……….

b) A person commits an offense if he:

  • Intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an individual;
  • Intends to cause serious bodily injury and commits an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual; or
  • Commits or attempts to commit a felony, other than manslaughter, and in the course of and in furtherance of the commission or attempt, or in immediate flight from the commission or attempt, he commits or attempts to commit an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual.

c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a felony of the first degree.

d) At the punishment stage of a trial, the defendant may raise the issue as to whether he caused the death under the immediate influence of sudden passion arising from an adequate cause. If the defendant proves the issue in the affirmative by a preponderance of the evidence, the offense is a felony of the second degree.

19.03. CAPITAL MURDER.

a) A person commits an offense if the person commits murder as defined under Section 19.02(b)(1) and:

  • The person murders a peace officer or fireman who is acting in the lawful discharge of an official duty and who the person knows is a peace officer or fireman;
  • The person intentionally commits the murder in the course of committing or attempting to commit kidnapping, burglary, robbery , aggravated sexual assault, arson, obstruction or retaliation, or terroristic threat under Section 22.07(a)(1), (3), (4), (5), or (6);
  • The person commits the murder for remuneration or the promise of remuneration or employs another to commit the murder for remuneration or the promise of remuneration;
  • The person commits the murder while escaping or attempting to escape from a penal institution
  • The person, while incarcerated in a penal institution, murders another:
  • A) who is employed in the operation of the penal institution; or
    B) with the intent to establish, maintain, or participate in a combination or in the profits of a combination;

  • The person:
  • A) while incarcerated for an offense under this section or Section 19.02, murders another; or
    B) while serving a sentence of life imprisonment or a term of 99 years for an offense under Section 20.04, 22.021, or 29.03, murders another;

  • The person murders more than one person:
  • A) during the same criminal transaction; or
    B) during different criminal transactions but the murders are committed pursuant to the same scheme or course of conduct;

  • The person murders an individual under six years of age; or
  • The person murders another person in retaliation for or on account of the service or status of the other person as a judge or justice of the supreme court, the court of criminal appeals, a court of appeals, a district court, a criminal district court, a constitutional county court, a statutory county court, a justice court, or a municipal court.

b) An offense under this section is a capital felony.

c) If the jury or, when authorized by law, the judge does not find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offense under this section, he may be convicted of murder or of any other lesser included offense.

19.04. MANSLAUGHTER.

a) A person commits an offense if he recklessly causes the death of an individual.

b) An offense under this section is a felony of the second degree.

19.05. CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE.

a) A person commits an offense if he causes the death of an individual by criminal negligence.

b) An offense under this section is a state jail felony

49.08. INTOXICATION MANSLAUGHTER.

a) A person commits an offense if the person:

  • Operates a motor vehicle in a public place, operates an aircraft, a watercraft, or an amusement ride, or assembles a mobile amusement ride; and
  • Is intoxicated and by reason of that intoxication causes the death of another by accident or mistake.

b) Except as provided by Section 49.09, an offense under this section is a felony of the second degree.

TexasGovernment Code (emphasis added)

557.012. CAPITAL SABOTAGE.

a) A person commits an offense if the person commits an offense under Section 557.011(a) and the sabotage or attempted sabotage causes the death of an individual.

(b) An offense under this section is punishable by:

  • death; or
  • confinement in the institutional division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for:
  • A) life; or
    B) a term of not less than two years.
    C) If conduct constituting an offense under this section also .

c) constitutes an offense under other law, the actor may be prosecuted under both sections.

The accomplice witness rule

January 16th, 2012

According to the January 3, 2012, Houston Chronicle, northeast Houston-area residents have been charged with felony theft in connection with an alleged $70,000 coupon fraud scheme at the Humble supermarket where they worked.

The four, who were not in custody Tuesday morning, were identified in court records as Traveon Monte Boyd, 19, of Humble; Krystal Keaira Cormier, 19, of Houston; Corey Scott Lester, 21, of Porter; and Latrisha Wilkerson, 23, of Humble.
An investigator for Kroger stores told Humble police that the four suspects, while employed as cashiers at the store at 19611 U.S. 59, took part in a coupon scheme that allowed customers to buy items at a large discount.

They used a “coupon override function” on the cash register that allowed them to give the coupons a dollar value of their choosing, according to a complaint filed Friday by the Harris County District Attorney’s Office.

The alleged scheme took place from July 20 to Oct. 16, bringing the store’s total loss to nearly $69,900, according to court documents.

The store investigator said she interviewed three of the defendants, who told her operators of a flea market paid them to override coupons that did not match the products being purchased, records state.

Cormier declined the agent’s request for an interview, according to the complaint.

The investigator reviewed each defendant’s register log and also saw footage of them using the override function on security-camera video, the complaint said.

So that’s the story. But the question arises: what if one or more of these individuals testifies against another? What does the law say? How does the jury weigh that?

The accomplice witness rule is a rule of Texas Criminal Procedure. In Texas, you cannot be convicted solely on the word of another party who was involved in the crime. So the prosecution in this case must show something to support or corroborate what the cooperating witness says. But if all they have is his word, you can’t be convicted. You can be convicted on the word of one person, but that person can’t be charged or implicated in the same crime that you are charged with. Houston criminal lawyers have won cases based on the accomplice witness rule. So the rule is alive and well in Harris County, Texas. Indeed, prosecutors sometimes are unable to file charges because they realize they have nothing but a snitch’s word to support their case.

You need a criminal defense attorneys in Houston Texas, who understands the law of parties and accomplice witnesses if you are charged with a case involving a snitch or cooperating witness. This is a relatively complex area, often arising in drug cases, and requires the guiding hand of a Board Certified criminal attorney.

Community supervision and parole

January 8th, 2012

In Texas, there are two types of community supervision: straight probation and deferred adjudication. The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure defines community supervision as “the placement of a defendant by a court under a continuum of programs and sanctions, with conditions imposed by the court for a specified period during which: (a) criminal proceedings are deferred without an adjudication of guilt; or (b) a sentence of imprisonment or confinement, imprisonment and fine, or confinement and fine, is probated and the imposition of sentence is suspended in whole or in part.”

In short, community supervision is an alternative to serving a sentence in a jail or penitentiary and is a chance to promote positive change in an offender’s behavior.

You must distinguish community supervision from what is called “parole.”

The Texas Code of Criminal Procedures defines parole as “the discretionary and conditional release of an eligible prisoner sentenced to the institutional division so that the prisoner may serve the remainder of his sentence under the supervision and control of the Pardons and Parole Division.” Texas Department of Criminal Justice is charged with supervising parolees and also provides regulatory oversight for community supervision.

The Fifth Amendment in Houston Harris County criminal cases

January 5th, 2012

If a prosecutor believes that a witness impermissibly invoked the Fifth Amendment before a grand jury, he can request the judge overseeing the grand jury or trial to require the witness answer the question. United States v. DiMauro, 441 F.2d 428 (8th Cir. 1971). This is what has happened with the Harris County Assistant District Attorney who was subpoenaed to testify recently at a grand jury investigating possible crimes that District Attorney’s office may have been involved in. The problem is that the grand jury witness, if she properly invokes the Fifth Amendment, cannot be required to answer questions that would incriminate her.

In Texas courts, the prosecutor can offer immunity. There are two common types of immunity in these instances: transactional immunity and use immunity. Transactional immunity, sometimes referred to as blanket immunity, protects you from being prosecuted for the crime for which you are testifying. Use immunity, however, only precludes your own testimony being used against you, but does not protect you against the testimony of other witnesses in any future prosecution. The general rule is that a trial court has no power to grant immunity without approval by the state. Fuentesv. State, 622 S.W.2d 19 (Tex. App.–Houst. [1st] 1983).

Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972), was a Supreme Court decision that ruled on the issue of whether the government’s grant of immunity from prosecution can compel a witness to testify over his assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

In a 5-2 decision (Justices Brennan and Rehnquist took no part in the consideration of the case), the Court held that the government can overcome a claim of Fifth Amendment privilege by granting a witness “use and derivative use” immunity in exchange for his testimony.

In this case, Petitioners were subpoenaed to appear before a United States grand jury in the Central District of California on February 4, 1971. The Government believed that petitioners were likely to assert their Fifth Amendment privilege. Prior to the scheduled appearances, the Government applied to the District Court for an order directing petitioners to answer questions and produce evidence before the grand jury under a grant of immunity conferred pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6003(a). Petitioners opposed issuance of the order, contending primarily that the scope of the immunity provided by the statute was not coextensive with the scope of the privilege against self-incrimination, and therefore was not sufficient to supplant the privilege and compel their testimony.

The District Court rejected this contention, and ordered petitioners to appear before the grand jury and answer its questions under the grant of immunity.

Petitioners appeared but refused to answer questions, asserting their privilege against compulsory self-incrimination. They were brought before the District Court, and each persisted in his refusal to answer the grand jury’s questions, notwithstanding the grant of immunity. The court found both in contempt, and committed them to the custody of the Attorney General until either they answered the grand jury’s questions or the term of the grand jury expired. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed (406 U.S. 441, 443). The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the important question whether testimony may be compelled by granting immunity from the use of compelled testimony and evidence derived therefrom (”use and derivative use” immunity), or whether it is necessary to grant immunity from prosecution for offenses to which compelled testimony relates (”transactional” immunity).

The United States can compel testimony from an unwilling witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination by conferring immunity, as provided by 18 U.S.C. § 6002, from use of the compelled testimony and evidence derived therefrom in subsequent criminal proceedings, as such immunity from use and derivative use is coextensive with the scope of the privilege and is sufficient to compel testimony over a claim of the privilege. Transactional immunity would afford broader protection than the Fifth Amendment privilege, and is not constitutionally required. In a subsequent criminal prosecution, the prosecution has the burden of proving affirmatively that evidence proposed to be used is derived from a legitimate source wholly independent of the compelled testimony.

Remember: if you have any doubt whether you need a criminal defense attorney in Houston Texas, you should not hesitate to seek one. Call me at 713-227-4444 or email me if you have any questions about your Fifth Amendment rights. I am available for free consultations.

Importance of hiring a Houston criminal lawyer before going to court

December 27th, 2011

Abraham Lincoln once said that an attorney’s counsel was his stock in trade. In other words, you pay an attorney for his good judgment. A lawyer’s good judgment generally leads to the best results obtainable. Every day, a falsely accused gets convicted, or railroaded, due to criminal defense lawyers’ poor judgment. Do not make the mistake of being the victim of a lawyer’s poor judgment.

Hiring the best criminal lawyer in Houston, Texas, that you can afford is your top priority in a criminal case. No doubt, bad things sometimes happen to good people. When you are charged with a crime, you need a Houston criminal attorney who understands the fear, anxiety and uncertainty a criminal defendant feels. Criminal lawyers in Houston, Texas who are well-qualified and have lots of experience will fight to protect your rights and your freedom. They will use their good judgment to make sure you are protected from the zeal of prosecutors.

No matter how much you know about law, or even if you are a lawyer, do not represent yourself on your own. It is important to hire a specialized lawyer who knows what he is doing. After all, would a surgeon ever operate on himself? Here is what to expect from good competent lawyers:

  • They will investigate the case carefully and thoroughly, doing an independent legal and factual investigation.
  • They will be Board Certified in criminal law.
  • They will have not only handled but actually tried all types of cases, State and federal.
  • They know who the prosecutors and judges are, and know what to expect.
  • They will prepare you for what to expect in court.
  • They will achieve the best possible result they can in light of the law and facts.

If you just want to show up and plead guilty, without putting up a fight, then almost any lawyer can enter a plea. But if you want to fight your case, you need to hire the best lawyer you find in Harris County, Texas. Neal Davis is Board Certified in criminal law, has experience handling and trying all types of cases, and has a proven track record of getting results. Contact his law firm for a free initial consultation.

Domestic ,family violence and assault charges

December 22nd, 2011

Women and girls are often the targets of violence, including domestic violence, sexual assault, forced marriage and trafficking. Violence strikes women from all kinds of backgrounds and of all ages. It can happen at work, on the street, or at home. Sometimes, women are attacked by strangers, but most often they are hurt by people who are close to them, such as a husband or partner. But the reality is that women occasionally make false allegations of domestic violence to, say, retaliate or get the upper hand in a family law proceeding such as divorce or a custody battle. If you are charged with domestic violence, you need to hire a Board Certified criminal defense lawyer in Houston, Texas, who will fight for your rights and work to achieve the best possible result. If you do not get a criminal attorney in Harris County, who will speak for you in court? You cannot and should not.

Here is a list of the various types of domestic violence:

Dating violence

Dating violence is when one person purposely hurts. It can happen to all peoples of races, cultures, incomes, and education levels. The dating violence includes physical, emotional and sexual abuse

Domestic violence:

Domestic violence is also called close spouse violence because it often is caused by a husband, ex-husband, boyfriend, or ex-boyfriend. Women also can be abusers. Usually the abuse starts as an emotional abuse and it will lead to physical later. Sometimes it is harder to know that the people are being abused.

Emotional abuse:

  • Prevents or discourages you from seeing friends or family
  • Gets angry in a way that is frightening to you
  • Humiliates you in front of others
  • Threatens to hurt you or people you care about

Trafficking:

Women are forced or tricked into working in terrible conditions. The trafficking may leads to kidnapping also, a person who is trafficked may be drugged, locked up, beaten, starved, or made to work for many hours a day. Types of work a trafficked person may be forced to do include prostitution, farm work, cleaning, childcare, or sweatshop work. Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of Texas are increasingly targeting human trafficking. Unfortunately, in their zeal to prosecute these cases, these prosecutors falsely assume the women (e.g., prostitutes) are “victims” when in fact they voluntarily and knowingly came to the United States through smugglers and choose their employment. You need the best federal criminal defense attorney in Houston to protect against false trafficking allegations.

Sexual Assault:

Sexual assault or abuse is any type of sexual activity that a person does not agree to, Sometimes sexual violence is committed by a stranger. Most often, though, it is committed by someone you know, including a date or an intimate partner like a husband, ex-husband, or boyfriend. Sexual violence is always wrong, and a person who is sexually abused does not ever “cause” the attack. Like domestic violence, false allegations of sexual abuse are occasionally made for a variety of reasons.

Stalking:

Stalking is contact (usually two or more times) from someone that makes you feel afraid or harassed. Stalking includes

  • Following or spying on you
  • Sending you unwanted emails or letters
  • Calling you often
  • Showing up at your house, school, or work
  • Leaving you unwanted gifts

    The rights if your child is arrested and being charged

    December 9th, 2011

    If your child gets into trouble with the law for committing a crime and criminal proceedings are started, you need to be aware of what to expect and where to get advice.

    A child who has been charged with a crime needs advice from an attorney who handles only criminal cases. Your child should hire a Houston criminal lawyer because of the experience, reputation, and proven results of the Harris County criminal defense bar. This is because what happens next can be serious if you do not have the guiding hand of counsel.

    If your arrested child is under 18, the police should not interview your child until your attorney is in the police station or in the court. Even then, make sure the attorney consents to an interview. The police have a duty to let you know if your child is arrested, charged with a crime, or must go to court. It is a good idea to be informed and involved with your child’s case. This is your child’s life so you should take care of it. Make sure he or she does not consent to any interviews unless his Houston criminal lawyer agrees, and do not let him be interviewed without his Harris county criminal defense attorney You probably ended up on this site as you were looking for criminal attorneys online. If you are facing criminal charges, chances are that your head is already swimming in fears and worries. The best thing to do in such a situation is to hand over your problems to someone who is experienced in such matters and will help you get the best out of the situation. You need to make sure that you are keeping your cool and not losing sleep which would make matters worse. Therefore you have come to the right place for help if you’re facing legal complications. “>Harris County criminal defense attorney.

    If your child is under 10, they cannot be taken to court and charged with a criminal offence. However, once they are 10 or above, they are treated in the same way as any person under 18.
    If it is the first time your child has gotten into trouble, behaved anti-socially, or committed a minor offense, they can be dealt with outside the court system through, say, a pre-trial diversion or deferred prosecution. This is often ideal, if the child is in fact guilty, because the child’s record can later be erased quicker than if he received a final conviction (depending on the offense).

    If the child is arrested, they can be let out by the bail or allowed to go home or remanded and made to stay in custody before appearing in a juvenile court. If your child pleads guilty or is convicted of the charge, he or she will be sentenced by the juvenile court.

    Many juvenile cases end up being dismissed with an “informal disposition.” This happens when the child admits guilt and agrees to settle the charges by meeting requirements set by the court or the prosecutor. The requirements include:

    • Restitution - When the child is required to refund the victim for the property damage he or she caused
    • Community service - When the child is required to spend a certain number of hours working in the community without pay
    • School attendance - When the child is required to attend school regularly and make satisfactory grades
    • Counseling - When the child is required to participate in counseling for drug or emotional problems

    The Case for Legalizing Marijuana

    November 28th, 2011

    • Prohibition must be weighed against the loss of personal freedom. The United States has a responsibility to respect individual free will and the right of self-determination. This includes allowing people to choose to do what they want as long as they do not harm others.
    • The immorality of marijuana use can only be based on one set of moral beliefs. By taking a “moral” stand against recreational drugs, the opposite effect usually occurs. Particularly youngsters are more attracted to marijuana because it seems taboo and sinister.
    • The War on Drugs serves the immediate interests of politicians and those in the “criminal industrial complex”: Politicians, prisons, prosecutors, judges, probation officer, and even defense lawyers only profit when marijuana is illegalized. I could care a less if I lose money through marijuana legalization. Right is right, and no persuasive argument exists to illegalize completely marijuana.
    • Legal prohibition does not stop consumers from consuming drugs, it does not stop trafficers from producing and selling it. The price of the final product increases to abnormally high values because of the black market status, which together with the powerful effects of drug addiction causes users to commit crimes to finance addiction. Further, drug violence can occur among rival drug dealers.
    • Critics of the War on Drugs advocate the partial or complete decriminalization of illegal drugs, combined with a system of regulation, as happens with alcohol and prescription drugs. By providing legal supplies of currently illegal drugs the price will fall, leading to a collapse in the illegal drug industry, and a reduction in crimes committed by both drug suppliers and users. Just look at California with medical marijuana.The street value of this marijuana would be much higher if it were not legalized for medical marijuana.
    • It is not worthwhile for a law to forbid people from willingly exposing their own bodies to harm by using drugs, any more than by overeating or bungee-jumping. Obesity is a national epidemic, killing millions every year, but the government has no right to regulate how much citizens eat.
    • Illegal Drug dealers will sell to anyone, including children. Merchants who legally sell alcohol and tobacco are not allowed to sell to children. Many high school students say it is easier to obtain illegal drugs than alcohol and tobacco.

    The rights and responsibilities when you are stopped by the police in the traffic offense

    November 17th, 2011

    The police can stop your vehicle upon reasonable suspicion. If police stop you, try not to be scared or nervous. Here I explain what you need to know to safeguard your rights when dealing with the police. A well-informed civilian is an empowered civilian.

    Rights

    • You have the right to decline a search of yourself, your car or your home.
    • If you are not arrested or detained, you can leave
    • You have the right to contact a criminal lawyer if you are arrested
    • Regardless of your citizenship status, you have constitutional rights
    • The officer does not have the power to stop you purely as a pretext, without sufficient legal basis, to find evidence
    • If you are arrested, then you have right to speak with a lawyer before answering police questions, you have a right not to sign anything given to you by the police, and you should not sign or do anything without your lawyer’s consent
    • If you are unhappy with how you were treated by the police, you can file a complaint but it is better that you do this after your criminal case is resolved.
    Responsibilities

    • Be calm and polite
    • Do not interfere with police
    • Do not argue with the police
    • Do not argue even if you are innocent
    • Do not make any statements regarding the incident, since things you believe are not hurtful may later incriminate you
    • You must show your license, registration and other documents to the cop during a traffic stop
    • Do not touch or run when the police officer stops you

    Think carefully when you are speaking with the cop because anything that you say or do may be turned against you. The best free advice a suspect can get is to REMAIN SILENT. Hire a lawyer to speak on your behalf and fight for your rights.

    Dr. Murray and involuntary manslaughter / negligent homicide

    October 12th, 2011

    Dr. Conrad Murray is charged with the involuntary manslaughter of Michael Jackson. It is interesting to compare the California offense with the Texas analogue. California Penal Code 192(b) defines “involuntary manslaughter” as an unlawful killing that takes place:

    1. during the commission of an unlawful act (not amounting to a felony), or

    2. during the commission of a lawful act which involves a high risk of death or great bodily harm that is committed without due caution or circumspection.

    Let’s take a closer look at some of these terms to gain a better understanding of their legal meanings.

    An unlawful act (not amounting to a felony)

    An “unlawful act” (not amounting to a felony) is either a misdemeanor or an infraction. There is no requirement that the unlawful act be inherently dangerous…that is, an act that carries a high probability that it will result in death. Rather, it is the manner in which this act is performed that creates the criminal liability for this offense.

    Example: A husband and wife are involved in a heated argument. In an effort to “threaten” his wife into silence, the husband retrieves his gun…a misdemeanor. The wife struggles to get the gun out of her husband’s hands and, in doing so, causes the husband to pull the trigger and kill her. Even though the husband didn’t have the intent to kill his wife, the fact that she was killed while he engaged in misdemeanor conduct makes involuntary manslaughter the appropriate charge.

    Without due caution and circumspection

    The phrase “without due caution and circumspection” is basically synonymous with the legal definition of “criminal negligence” in California. It is an act which is “aggravated, reckless and flagrant and which is such a departure from what would be the conduct of an ordinary prudent, careful person under the same circumstances as to be in disregard for human life, or an indifference to the consequences of such an act.”7

    Criminal negligence means that the death was not the result of inattention, mistaken judgment or misadventure, but rather it was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the aggravated, reckless or negligent conduct.

    Example: Dr. Murray is charged … with violating Penal Code 192(b) PC California’s involuntary manslaughter law for allegedly administering lethal doses of an anesthetic to Jackson while treating him for insomnia. In their charge, the D.A. stated that “Dr. Murray did unlawfully kill Michael Joseph Jackson by acting without due caution and circumspection”. Prosecutors will attempt to prove that Dr. Murray acted with criminal negligence when he administered such a large dose of the anesthetic, an anesthetic that they contend is used in preparation for surgery, not as a sleep aid (which is why it was being used). The D.A. will argue that a reasonable doctor in the same situation would not have authorized the same quantity of the drug.

    Texas Penal Code Section 19.05, entitled “Criminally Negligent Homicide,” is the closest to the California statute. Under this statute, “A person commits an offense if he causes the death of an individual by criminal negligence.” Texas Penal Code Section 6.03 defines “criminal negligence” as: “the person ought to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the circumstances as viewed from the actor’s standpoint.”